morehere.A Free Internet From An Historical PerspectiveThose of us who owned home computers in the early 1990's thrilled to rapidly advancing wonders of a technology which exploded into today's digital revolution. The future progress of this revolution is threatened today by its very success, corporate America having become involved in pursuit of its own commercial interests.
Our present screed is not an attack on capitalism. The profit motive resulted in rapid dissemination of huge technological advances and introduced wonders of a new personal computer age to millions of persons. Our present concerns, however, provide an example, as well as a warning, of dangers created when the corporate world, despite its efficiency, succeeds in monopolizing avenues indispensable to the free-flow of human creativity.
The future of the Internet brings us face to face with interesting practical and ideological considerations. As in many areas, a conflict arises between free market policy in a world of corporations and a public interest to be protected by regulatory involvement -- laws and control by the State. Each of us must now examine the issues and express her views. Failure to do so may result in losses to us all of further technological advances and of yet to be imagined wonders possible in the coming years. How I wish I had known in 1994 what my hobby would become in only ten years! Of course, I would have registered dozens of cool domain names (after all, we picked them up free at the time).
For several years, the ISP (Internet Service Provider) business, often run on a geek's computer located in his basement or garage, provided computer owners access to each other's machines by means of one or more telephone numbers. Prior to Internet interface there were a number of separate and unconnected so-called "online services" including CompuServe, Genii, Dephi, AOL and Prodigy and there were hundreds of local "bulletin boards" containing (among other things) wonderful utility files created to broaden the computer's operations in a DOS environment. Ah, the good old days!
To begin with, we knew that it was bound to happen. Even after the online services interfaced with the Internet and were thereby able to exchange emails, and as long as access to the new medium was diversified, censorship and control was problematical. However, after the telephone companies and cable TV companies replaced the local ISP's in providing access, censorship and control would inevitably become an issue.
By centralizing and owning the pipelines, these corporations acquire the means to control its content and technology. Again, we knew that this day would come. We also knew that we would be faced with a paradox. On the one hand, we would argue for freedom from internet controls and, on the other hand, we would seek regulatory controls to prohibit telephone and cable companies from interfering with "our" new medium.
To my way of thinking, the decision is clear. We must prevent these corporations from any interference with both content as well as with developing technology created during mankind's new digital revolution. Content may threaten certain individuals' sensibilities. Developing technology may threaten certain vested commercial interests.
In the past century we have witnessed horrible and tragic events resulting from having populations of national states governed by political henchmen of corporate commercial interests. That is the inevitable result of governmental support of powerful financial interests in lieu of other human values. Net neutrality provides a microcosm of this fundamental problem. Today it is, perhaps, its most important aspect.
The Internet must be left free to develop in its own way, just as populations must be left free to develop in their own ways. It is the Internet that brings to mankind the potential to communicate freely across national borders and the hope for a world united in peace, tolerant of differences, and indifferent to corporate balance sheets.
que logica tiene querer ganar el mundo y a la misma ves estra siendo estafados , esa logica es la que no quieren escuchar los cultos lllamese dianetica testigos mormones y tantos de el fraude de el diesmo , la logica es que devemos ayudar a el culto a exoandir la verdad , y la verdad es una teologia que nada mas sirve como cortina de humo para sacar dinero y trabajo a los que estan en el culto claro que se les dice que mientras estes ahi estas salvado , por rason de la telogia que predican , pero cuando investigas las finanzas te das cuenta que has sido estafado , ahora bien los cultos siempre estan en la campaña de decir que cualquiera que ataca a la marca de su religion o la denigra esta en realidad en contra d ela verdad , pero la verdad es que ellos estan ganando dinero y tapando la falta de etica que tienen , , o sea que no se aplican a la verdad que dicen predicar como si de alguna manero los directores de el culto estubieran exentos de escrutinio , , pero no lo estan , y este es un despertar a la realidad a la que se estan enfrentando muchos de los que realmente quieren andar en la verdad, la verdad esta en la ausencia de mentira y corrupcion verdad¡?
When the parents act as parents children as sons and evrithing in life plays the rol that is correct and just to play , then there is happines , so many folosophies states that , but not in this clear therms , , we in the circle of happines are commited to do just that , to educate so we can anlarge the circle , to make evrione happy after all , it is not , what we year for , ? of course thats the purpouse off life and in order to do that we firs must acknolodge the roll that we are playing and to examine it serously , as you may know nobody likes to play the fool , and sometimes , is this rool that is forced upon us , and is not of our ouwn violition , , that is to said it is not part of the game that we are alowed to play and as soon as you recognize that you can take measures to stop playing the victim ,. well this is another page off mine
To aply the ethics to you circle of edepts , do not get the same mistake scientology , and all the cults do , you first diseminate the teck to thet them in the road to be financialy free and , time free so they can work in the second level , that is to get the dinamic of the group goin on , that is to said the policeies that make the group guive and take without sacrificing nobody , thats the way , then we can take over the world , in the same maner guiving and taking in an athical optimus way , were is the mistake then ?
Para aplicar la etica a tu circulo de adeptos no devemos de cometer el error que cometio ronald h hubbard , de entre sus mismas fila aplicar metodos correctivos para explotacion de el culto , eso es passe pues sucede en muchos cultos , y francamente esta fuera de etica si nos ponemos a pensar , mas bien es la diseminacion de el mejoramiento personal , de la persona , y luego que la persona ya esta bien fisica moral y financieramente entonces puede gastarse en estructurar el segundo y tercer nivel que es el familiar , el grupal y el mundo}ial , para aplicar las dinamica sociales que veneficien a los adeptos , , es una especie de piramide donde los que alcanzan los niveles mas altos estan sosteniendo a los que estan en los niveles mas bajos en un intercambio de materia enrgia espacio y tiempo , sin llegar a ser dependientes de ellos , y ellos sin llegar a ser autores de corrupcion , y usted que piensa? bueno ahora unos comerciales para la ayuda a los que estan en el nivel mas bajo , , claro que ellos son independientes pero para yudarlos a avanzar a los niveles mas altos , en un acto de coperacion de lo que tenemos los ayudamos.
ATTENTION! If You or Someone You Love is Suffering from Cancer, Then This Will Be the Most Important Letter You Will Ever Read...
Gentle, Non-toxic Healing Of Cancer Is Not Only Possible -- Ive Done It For Over 3,000 People In The Last 8 Years. Join My Crusade. Help People Avoid The Barbaric Chemo, Radiation And Surgery Which Kills Millions Of Cancer Patients Every Year.You do not need aprescription or a doctor to cure cancer,
The news I'm going to tell you enrages most American doctors. Nothing makes them more furious than the fact that alternative remedies not only work -- they often work at home without a doctor's help!
Dear Friend,"It's cancer." Two of the most frightening words you could ever hear your doctor say.
After coping with the shock, most of us would find the very best doctor we can and follow his treatment plan to the letter. After all, he went to school for 13 years, he's the cancer expert, right?
Believe it or not...
You can treat cancer more successfully than most doctors!It's true. While conventional doctors are undoubtedly experts in chemo, radiation and surgery (the only treatments taught in most medical schools), these are not the safest, most effective ways to cure most cancers.
Sure, they can beat back the cancer for a while, but these treatments also poison your whole body, especially your immune system. They weaken your body's natural defenses just when you need them most. That's why you see cancer patients get far sicker after starting chemo or radiation than they do with the cancer— they lose their hair, vomit, and get all sorts of infections. Many patients decide they'd rather die than go through it a second time – and that's exactly what they choose to do.
If all that misery actually cured cancer it might be worth it – but most of the time it doesn't! These treatments fail more often than they succeed!
That's right, after our loved ones have suffered for months on end and paid an average of $350,000 for conventional treatments, over 55% of the most feared cancers come back again according to researchers at the prestigious MD Anderson Cancer Center.
So how come you’re hearing that chemo, radiation
and surgery are the way to cure cancer?I'll tell you the reason for this long-running myth in a moment, but first, I want you to know the important truth...
You don't need these scary, poisonous and expensive treatments to cure cancer. You can get rid of cancer naturally, safely and permanently. And you can do it in your own home for a fraction of the cost of conventional treatments.
In fact, except for diagnostic testing, with most cancers you don't even need a traditional hospital at all! A perfect example is Irma...
"30 years later, I'm still cancer free!" reports IrmaWhen Irma was diagnosed with throat cancer in her early 50's, she told me how she followed her doctor's orders and had a surgeon remove part of her vocal cord. Then she underwent chemo. Everything was fine for awhile, but six years later the cancer came back.
This time, doctors said, they would have to cut out her entire larynx, leaving her unable to speak. And they said if she refused surgery, the growing tumor would eventually block her airway. She'd literally be unable to breathe – she'd choke to death!
These horrible treatments didn't work the first time, Irma recalled wondering, so why would I go through more of that again?
Irma refused surgery and "horrible" chemoInstead, she found a natural cancer remedy she could take on her own, without suffering any side effects. Turns out, this was the best decision of her life...
In just six weeks, Irma's voice was clear, the inflammation in her throat had disappeared and most important—the tumor was shrinking! Here's what she told me...
"I felt much better and decided to show my family doctor how I was coming along. When he looked down my throat, he was amazed to see that the redness was gone and the tumor had shrunk."
By the time I interviewed Irma, 30 years had passed without any cancer recurrence. She was in her mid 80's, sharp as a tack and surprisingly full of energy. Yet the aggressive tumor was supposed to have killed her decades before. And she beat it without dangerous chemo, radiation or even surgery!
So how did she do it?more here
"How Millions of People Worldwide
Successfully Treat Cancer Using Low-cost,
Natural, Alternative Cancer Therapies"
Online Since 2002
A Complete Guide to Time-tested, Proven, Natural
Alternative Cancer Therapies, Doctors & Hospitals.
Are you frustrated or confused by the FLOOD of successful,
natural, alternative cancer treatments on the Internet today?
Finally, a natural alternative cancer treatment consultant who's counseled over 1,100 people
shows you how to make your way through the Internet JUNGLE and get what works for you.
Fact: Did you know that quietly behind the scenes, millions of
people worldwide have successfully treated cancer since the 1920s
using low cost, natural, alternative cancer treatments alone?
They are commonplace in 85 countries now ...... except the USA!
Yes, since the 1920s.
The Problem Is, the Public Never Hears Anything About all This! Worse yet, conventional doctors
(MD Oncologists) are never taught anything about proven natural therapies in their medical schools.
They're taught high-profit pharmaceutical drugs, radiation andsurgery - period.
in life we all have something to share, and if we share and share is better see bitcoin money here En la vida todos tenemos algo que compartir , y si compartimos y respondemos es mucho mejor , saludos.